Interview
Interiew Questions
Problem-Solving Interview Questions
A structured question bank to evaluate how candidates frame problems, find root causes, generate options, and deliver solutions under real constraints.
.png)
Use this curated, category-based bank to assess structured problem-solving across ambiguity, data, and constraints. Each section includes prompts and cues for what strong answers demonstrate.
Problem Framing & Clarification
- When you’re given a vague goal, what’s your first step?
Good answers: Clarify the objective, constraints, stakeholders, success metrics, and timeline; restate for alignment. - Tell me about a poorly framed problem you reframed.
Good answers: Shifted from solutions to outcomes; defined scope and acceptance criteria; improved results. - How do you avoid solving the wrong problem?
Good answers: Validate with quick data points, user interviews, or experiments before deep solutioning. - What questions do you ask in the first 15 minutes?
Good answers: Who/what/why/when, impact, constraints, dependencies, prior attempts, and “what happens if we do nothing.” - Example of narrowing scope to make progress.
Good answers: MVP, timebox, or pilot that unlocked learning and momentum.
Root Cause Analysis
- Walk me through a defect you traced to the root cause.
Good answers: Structured method (5 Whys, fishbone), data gathered, true cause vs. symptoms, and prevention. - How do you separate correlation from causation?
Good answers: Controlled comparisons, instrumentation, A/B or holdouts, and domain logic checks. - Describe a time the root cause was process, not people.
Good answers: Systemic fix (checklists, SOPs, automation) replacing blame. - What signals tell you you’re at the wrong level of analysis?
Good answers: Fixes don’t stick, repeated edge cases, conflicting anecdotes; zoom in/out accordingly. - How do you validate a suspected root cause quickly?
Good answers: Fast experiment, targeted log, or field test before large work.
Hypothesis & Experimentation
- Explain your hypothesis-to-test workflow.
Good answers: Hypothesis, measurable prediction, minimal test, success/fail thresholds, and next step rules. - A time your experiment disproved your belief.
Good answers: Changed course quickly, shared learning, and updated roadmap. - How do you choose between precision and speed in testing?
Good answers: Risk/impact driven, sample size pragmatism, and staged testing. - What’s your approach to designing guardrail metrics?
Good answers: Protects user experience/revenue while testing; alerts on regressions. - How do you ensure experiments lead to decisions?
Good answers: Pre-registered decision rules, owners, and time-bound calls.
Prioritization & Trade-offs
- You have five fixes but capacity for two. Pick.
Good answers: Scoring model (impact × confidence ÷ effort), dependencies, risk, and opportunity cost. - Describe a time you said no to a senior stakeholder.
Good answers: Clear rationale, alternatives, timeline, and relationship maintained. - How do you balance short-term patches vs. long-term solutions?
Good answers: Dual-track plan with explicit criteria to replace the patch. - When do you stop analysis and act?
Good answers: Reversibility, cost of delay, and decision deadlines. - What’s your escalation policy for blocked issues?
Good answers: Thresholds by impact/time, defined channels, and owner accountability.
Quantitative Thinking & Estimation
- Do a Fermi estimate for our weekly active users.
Good answers: Stated assumptions, step-by-step math, sanity checks, and ranges. - How do you validate a surprising metric?
Good answers: Reproduce query, check definitions, compare cohorts/time, and instrument a second measure. - What’s your checklist before sharing numbers with execs?
Good answers: Source, date/version, rounding, definitions, and peer review. - Explain variance you recently investigated.
Good answers: Hypotheses, cuts (segment, channel, device), root cause, and fix. - Cost/benefit example for a proposed solution.
Good answers: Expected value, sensitivity analysis, and risks.
Creativity & Lateral Thinking
- Describe a non-obvious solution you shipped.
Good answers: Constraint-driven creativity, prototypes, and learning. - How do you generate options beyond the first idea?
Good answers: Divergent/convergent thinking, “crazy 8s,” or analogies from other domains. - When do you deliberately break a rule?
Good answers: Risk-aware exceptions with clear reasoning and post-check. - Tell me about leveraging constraints to innovate.
Good answers: Simplified scope, reused components, or reframed problem. - What signals show an idea is elegant vs. clever?
Good answers: Simplicity, fewer moving parts, resilience, and user delight.
Decision-Making Under Uncertainty
- Share a high-impact call you made with limited data.
Good answers: Risks, reversibility, pre-mortem, and contingency plan. - How do you de-bias your decisions?
Good answers: Red-team, checklists, base rates, and counterfactuals. - What’s your approach to scenario planning?
Good answers: Down/base/up cases with triggers and decision rules. - A time doing nothing was the best choice.
Good answers: Option value and information arrival outweighted action. - How do you capture and revisit assumptions?
Good answers: Assumption log with owners, confidence, and review cadence.
Execution & Iteration
- How do you turn an analysis into action?
Good answers: Clear owner, next steps, milestones, and success metrics. - Describe a fast iteration loop you set up.
Good answers: Telemetry, feedback channels, and weekly review rhythm. - What do you track post-launch?
Good answers: Leading indicators, guardrails, and error budgets. - How do you know when to pivot vs. persevere?
Good answers: Predefined thresholds and learning milestones. - Example of removing work to solve a problem.
Good answers: Stopped doing low-value tasks; simplified process; net impact positive.
Collaboration & Influence
- Tell me about influencing a solution without authority.
Good answers: Stakeholder map, incentives, artifacts (one-pagers), and pilots. - How do you handle conflicting opinions on the solution?
Good answers: Decision framework, DACI/RACI, and time-bound resolution. - When have you changed your mind from feedback?
Good answers: Specific example, impact, and credit-sharing. - What artifacts speed alignment?
Good answers: Problem statements, acceptance criteria, and visuals. - How do you keep users in the loop?
Good answers: Regular updates, release notes, and expectation setting.
Postmortems & Learning
- Walk me through a candid postmortem you led.
Good answers: Blameless, facts-first, root causes, and action items with owners. - How do you ensure lessons stick?
Good answers: Update SOPs, checklists, training, and dashboards. - What important belief have you changed recently?
Good answers: Evidence, scope of change, and communication. - How do you share learnings across teams?
Good answers: Docs, guilds, demos, internal talks. - Example of turning a failure into an advantage.
Good answers: Reframed insight leading to a better approach.
Case Study Prompts
- Capacity bottleneck: Reduce a 10-day cycle time by 30% with minimal spend.
- Churn spike: Diagnose a 2% → 4% monthly churn increase; propose fixes.
- Incident response: Draft a 24-hour plan to mitigate a P1 customer issue.
- Pricing error: You discover mispriced SKUs; contain, correct, and communicate.
- New market: Evaluate entering a niche vertical; define thesis, risks, and 2-quarter plan.
Tip: Look for clear problem statements, explicit assumptions, small experiments, and measurable outcomes. Strong problem-solvers show their work and close the loop.
